Peobody wrote: Mon May 09, 2022 5:12 pm
When you said that you changed all of your Waypoints to Shaping points and then selectively turned some back to Waypoints I had high hopes that there was a way to change Waypoints to Shaping points other than one at a time.
Ah, yes I did say that first statement. That was because every single route point in my route had been created as a Waypoint first. So in that context I was correct. I was being deliberately provocative as I know that some people think of Waypoints as being Via Points and don't realise that a Waypoint can be made into a non-alerting Shaping Point.
I didn't say that I turned them back to Wapoints. I said that I turned them back to Via Points!
If a point is created as a Waypoint it is always a waypoint.
If it is used in a route it is ALSO either a Via Point or a Shaping Point.
I like to take every opportunity to dispel the myth that waypoint=routepoint and that waypoint=via point.
But I know that you know that !
Peobody wrote: Mon May 09, 2022 5:12 pm
What are your thoughts about creating Waypoints for stops, generating a route using those waypoints, and then using the Insert tool to form that route as desired? I have been discouraged from doing so by fellows riders who use Basecamp because only the Waypoints can be selected should you need to return to a route. Neither of those guys had a device that had the "Closest point" option like the XT does so maybe their thinking was relevant to their devices but not to the XT.
Well, thats not a bad idea, but if the reason that they gave you that "only Waypoints can be selected should you need to return to a route" is wrong.
This would be when you tap Go and you are asked to select the next destination from a list. Whichever point you select, the Zumos (39x, 59x and XT) will navigate you to that point and then continue navigating your route from there.
But it isn't the Waypoints that the Zumo lists. Its the Via Points.
Understanding these different types of point is fundamental to understanding how the Zumo behaves when navigating, that you can form a pretty accurate opinion about whether to take notice of what someone is telling you - because if they don't realise that these terms are important, they won't have a chance of working out what is happening when you go off route and miss a via point.
The same people will then tell you that you have to use lots of route points to pin the route to your preferred roads. You don't. It works, but it stops it from being a satnav.
Your friends clearly think that a Via Point and a Waypoint are the same thing.
On the 590 I used to create just 5 Waypoints. Start, end and 3 stopping places. All the others were inserted into the route to make it follow particular roads. Maybe 3 points between each stopping place, but it varies.
I would then name all of them. I like to have the day number and a milage number at the start of each point, especially if I dont know the roads or the places. I set the trip meter at the start of each day. I then have some way of knowing which point comes next, should I ever lose my place in the route.
But the XT and the 595 scuppered this. The names I gave sometimes (often) get changed by the Zumo to something else. So my mileage value is not present. So when I look at the route list, or when it says 'Skip Wainmans Clough', I havent got a clue where that is. If it said the name that I gave it "03 123 A65 after Ingleton" that is really helpful. especially if I look at my trip and see that it shows 135 miles. The point is behind me.