Stu wrote: Tue Dec 13, 2022 7:51 pm
Is that the issue in where you deviate from a planned route and it just keeps on trying to take you back no matter how many times you ignore the directions?
I had an issue in Wales where I missed the turn (On purpose) and just carried on knowing full well I could re join the route further up
It kept on trying its hardest to take me back at every opportunity and I had to be right on top of the planned route before it decided to re join
Yes. That's the issue. I reported it and described it ages ago, and submitted evidence and descriptions. It was acknowledged and sent to the team to investigate further. Nothing since then. Half way through this process, my XT died and wouldn't restart, so it was replaced under warranty.
Then I then discovered that every time it got the 'go back whence you deviated' scenario, the track log ended, a short section was missed and a new one started. Repeatedly.
It would happily direct me to the route when it was about 2-3 miles ahead, but before that it still wanted me to turn and go back. I reported this and this is what we (the tech support expert and I are working on - and she expressed an interest in the u-turn issue. So once we have identified the broken track issue, she wants to do some more with the repeated U turn to the point of deviation. Which is great.
I discovered more info about this (which I need to confirm, but which
@lkraus has also observed. It seems that this happens :
* with planned routes with route points;
* If something has caused the route to be recalculated;
* And you deviate from the recalculated route.
When that happens, a new Via point is added to the route at the point of deviation. It doesn't show on the map. It doesn't show in the trip list, but if you select 'Skip' or 'Edit Route', this unknown point is shown as the next destination. Note 'destination' (via point) rather than 'shaping point'.
As I say, I have seen the u-turn behaviour a lot of times, and the additional via point a few times, but I have only spotted both at the same time just once - but I haven't been looking. But now I've seen it, it sort of explains previous observations. So I need to verify that. If it is that, I suspect that I know what is happening, but it all has to be checked out.
But my next test is to see if my brand new XT will create the broken track log in the identical circumstances to my returned unit. Meanwhile, they will be testing my returned unit to see if they can get that one to produce a broken track log.